jhetley: (Default)
[personal profile] jhetley
Okay, now they have voted to confiscate personal assets that people acquired legally through a specific allowance of previous congressional action . . .

"First they came for AIG, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't AIG . . ."

(Apologies to Rev. Niemoller)

Date: 2009-03-20 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pernishus.livejournal.com
Congress is doing what congress was designed to do (or at any rate to permit)... we must, however, continue to hope that the Supreme Court will function as it is designed to function...

Date: 2009-03-20 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhetley.livejournal.com
I have to say that the Supreme Court has shown . . . varied . . . reliability on defending the Constitution.

Date: 2009-03-20 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Confiscation of legally acquired assets is nothing new in this country. And I do not refer to taxes. I'm thinking of civil asset forfeiture, current boarder enforcement practices and other sorts of authoritarian corruption.

Then there's this situation in California where they not only came after the right of certain couples to marry, they're also after the marriages which were joined.

But in spite of all that, I'll admit to not shedding any tears for the folks at AIG....

Profile

jhetley: (Default)
jhetley

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 2728293031

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 27th, 2025 07:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios