That is correct. Here's what Obama said in Michigan yesterday:
Obama told a news conference in Michigan that "I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn't be a topic of our politics."
1. Neutral mentions or descriptions: "Candidate X has two children" or "Candidate Y's daughter is a sophomore in college".
2. The child him/herself has done something legitimately newsworthy: (for example, in a local newspaper) "Jane Smith, age 14, was the winner of the regional spelling bee. Smith's mother, senate candidate Sue Smith, said, 'I'm so proud of her!'" or "Two people have charged in connection with the robbery at a local convenience mart this weekend: Sue Smith, age 18, and John Jones, Jr., age 19. Jones is the son of John Jones, who is running for mayor." In other words, if the kid would have made the news without the connection to the candidate, it's fair game.
Lindsey Lohan, for example. Or Britney Spears. Or Paris Hilton.
Personally, I think the media is shameless and I hate the way they treat people, and this is why I've gone almost exclusively NPR (which, I believe, only mentioned Palin and has not discussed her offspring) since... oh, I don't know... the OJ trial?
So why didn't they come out with this up front, if they didn't want it discussed? They had to realize that someone was going to notice, and then it would be a topic for discussion. They could have defused the whole thing... but they didn't. Why?
Perhaps it's cynical of me to think that somebody was expecting the news to break when Bristol was a couple of months further along, giving McCain an excuse to pull an Eagleton at the last minute.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 01:49 pm (UTC)1. Neutral mentions or descriptions: "Candidate X has two children" or "Candidate Y's daughter is a sophomore in college".
2. The child him/herself has done something legitimately newsworthy: (for example, in a local newspaper) "Jane Smith, age 14, was the winner of the regional spelling bee. Smith's mother, senate candidate Sue Smith, said, 'I'm so proud of her!'" or "Two people have charged in connection with the robbery at a local convenience mart this weekend: Sue Smith, age 18, and John Jones, Jr., age 19. Jones is the son of John Jones, who is running for mayor." In other words, if the kid would have made the news without the connection to the candidate, it's fair game.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:07 pm (UTC)Lindsey Lohan, for example. Or Britney Spears. Or Paris Hilton.
Personally, I think the media is shameless and I hate the way they treat people, and this is why I've gone almost exclusively NPR (which, I believe, only mentioned Palin and has not discussed her offspring) since... oh, I don't know... the OJ trial?
C.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 05:08 pm (UTC)Yes, I went there. (in case you can't tell... I don't like Rush)
The Kennedy Children... well...
And then there's Amy Carter too.
C.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 03:56 pm (UTC)Perhaps it's cynical of me to think that somebody was expecting the news to break when Bristol was a couple of months further along, giving McCain an excuse to pull an Eagleton at the last minute.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 07:45 pm (UTC)