About that political post
Well, after a second cup of coffee, I've decided to post some of this anyway. Making Light has a bit this morning about police departments preparing for Civil Unrest after the election, with a subtext that only massive fraud can prevent an Obama victory.
http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/010706.html
Sorry, but I think that stinks.
See, if you question the integrity of the process, you cast doubt on an Obama victory as well as on a loss. If the Republicans can rig an election, so can the Democrats. I grew up in Cook County, Illinois, home of Mayor Daley (Elder or Younger). Democratic Party fraud sort of defined the process, there. Not sure whether it still does. But the lesson lives on -- Democrats can be just as sleazy as Republicans.
Demonize thy enemy . . .
http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/010706.html
Sorry, but I think that stinks.
See, if you question the integrity of the process, you cast doubt on an Obama victory as well as on a loss. If the Republicans can rig an election, so can the Democrats. I grew up in Cook County, Illinois, home of Mayor Daley (Elder or Younger). Democratic Party fraud sort of defined the process, there. Not sure whether it still does. But the lesson lives on -- Democrats can be just as sleazy as Republicans.
Demonize thy enemy . . .
no subject
no subject
Fraud... fraud worries me because there are too many places where you don't have any paper trail if you engage in fraud. If it wasn't for that, I'd feel a lot more comfortable with the process.
Given the poll numbers, if the election was held tomorrow, and Obama lost solidly, I *would* suspect fraud of one sort or another. (Note that a suspicion does not mean I'd consider it proven. It just means I'd consider it a real possibility.)
no subject