The difference between Republicans and Democrats . . .
. . . lies mainly in which rights they think we can get along just fine without.
The other side of the coin, counterpoint to all the unconstitutional excesses of the Bush Debacle: Gun shops experiencing an uptick in sales, in the face of a bad economy.
http://www.bangornews.com/detail/92892.html
" . . . shall not be infringed."
The other side of the coin, counterpoint to all the unconstitutional excesses of the Bush Debacle: Gun shops experiencing an uptick in sales, in the face of a bad economy.
http://www.bangornews.com/detail/92892.html
" . . . shall not be infringed."
Re: Response split due to comment length limit (1 of 2)
See, that bothers me. If one didn't vote for Obama it is automatically a vote against him?
I voted for Ron Paul. I did NOT vote against Obama nor McCain. (I'd be willing to consider that it was 15% a vote against Biden and Palin, however. Those two scare me.)
Re: Response split due to comment length limit (1 of 2)
Re: Response split due to comment length limit (1 of 2)
It's been a long time since I saw a candidate that I could vote _for_. This time around, I was most assuredly voting _against_ Gov. Palin. That "one heartbeat" thing.
Re: Response split due to comment length limit (1 of 2)
You make my brain hurt. I don't see voting as being against the other candidates. That's a fallacy the Demolicans/Republicrats have pushed on the voters.
It's the "Vote for the lesser of two evils" concept. As Alaric says, "That's still voting for evil."
You like two candidates equally so you flip a coin to decide who you are voting for. Does that mean you don't like the person who lost your coin toss anymore or not as much as you did before you flipped the coin?
Re: Response split due to comment length limit (1 of 2)